HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES House goes on record against Iran nuclear deal, in symbolic vote

The Republican-led House went on record Friday against the Iran nuclear deal, but the symbolic vote will not stop President Obama from implementing the agreement.

After three hours of hot-tempered debate, the House voted 269 to 162 to reject the deal. Some two dozen Democrats broke with Obama to register their disapproval.

The fate of the agreement on Capitol Hill, however, was sealed on Thursday when Senate Democrats voted to uphold the accord with Iran, overcoming heavy GOP opposition to hand Obama a victory on his top foreign policy priority.

The Senate action guaranteed that any legislation disapproving of the accord will never reach Obama’s desk. Moreover, House Democrats late Thursday announced there are now 146 members of the House who have publicly voiced their support of the agreement — enough to uphold a presidential veto even if any GOP legislation against the deal could get through.

The House was to vote later on a measure to suspend until Jan. 21, 2017 — a day after a new president is sworn into office — Obama’s authority to waive, suspend or reduce sanctions on Iran. That measure was expected to pass the House.

Democrats argued that the agreement would stabilize the Mideast, stop Iran from rushing to develop a nuclear bomb and offer a chance to end the standoff with Iran diplomatically, while retaining a U.S. threat of military action. They accused House Republicans of using their opposition to the nuclear deal to take a partisan shot at the president.

Republicans countered that the agreement’s inspection regime against Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism, is weak and repeatedly recalled how Islamic extremists attacked America on Sept. 11, 2001. They said the deal will allow Iran to eventually possess a nuclear weapon and that the billions it will receive through sanctions relief will end up in the hands of terrorist groups that Tehran supports.

“This deal is far worse than anything I could have imagined,” said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. “This is such a bad deal the ayatollah won’t even have to cheat to be steps away from a nuclear weapon.”

Boehner criticized the deal, saying that it does not have a rigorous enough inspection regime, will allow Iran to keep thousands of centrifuges spinning and will leave the nation with a chance to become a nuclear-armed state in about a decade.

“Never in our history has something with so many consequences for our national security been rammed through with such little support,” Boehner said. “Today is Sept. 11 … Our fight to stop this bad deal is just beginning. We will not let the American people down.”

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said that if the Iranians cheat, inspectors using advanced technology will know it. She noted that Iran is already on the threshold of being a nuclear-armed state and that the agreement delays this from becoming a reality for at least a decade.

“We mustn’t judge agreements for what they don’t do. … Today we will not be just making history … we will be making progress for the peace in the world,” Pelosi said.

Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., spoke vehemently against the deal but acknowledged that the vote will not stop the president from implementing the agreement.

The House measures could come up in the Senate next week, but would face a filibuster by Senate Democrats and Sept. 17 — the date slated for the close of congressional review of the deal — is less than a week away.

“I know the president may have already lined up enough support to save his deal. But with this vote, we need to send a message to both Iran and the world,” Ryan said.

“The regime may have bamboozled this administration, but the American people know that this is a rotten deal.”

Rep. Peter Roskam, R-Ill., who has been leading opposition to the accord in the House, however, said the Republicans’ fight against the deal is not over.

“Is this just a bad idea? … I think it wins the worse idea ever award,” Roskam said, hinting that House Republicans might take Obama to court over the deal.

“The notion that this is all done and it’s a settled case. It is not,” Roskam said.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest dismissed Boehner’s warning that he might sue Obama over the Iran deal, saying “We obviously feel quite confident in our ability to move forward with the rest of the international community.”

“Congress was given an opportunity to set the rules here and this was the outcome that occurred as a result of that process,” Earnest said of the Senate vote on the resolution of disapproval.

As part of the last-ditch effort to snarl the deal, the House on Thursday adopted a resolution on a vote of 245-186 saying that Obama had not complied with the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act.

Supporters of the resolution claimed the act required the president to supply Congress with all documents relevant to the deal, but that the administration did not give lawmakers texts of two agreements that the U.N. nuclear inspection agency negotiated separately with Tehran.

The administration says it doesn’t have the bilateral agreements and the nuclear inspection agency says confidentiality provisions prevent it from releasing them.

Rick Perry drops out of presidential race

Washington (CNN)Rick Perry, the former Texas governor who insisted he learned lessons from his disastrous 2012 presidential campaign, dropped his second bid for the White House on Friday after just 100 days.

“Today, I am suspending my campaign for the presidency of the United States,” Perry said in an address in St. Louis that virtually mirrored his standard stump speech until the very end. “Life is good. I am a blessed man.”

The departure of Perry, who had little support in early-voting states or among the GOP donor class, is unlikely to alter the contours of the Republican race. But Perry nevertheless implored his supporters in an email to back a candidate who embodies the principles of conservatism.

“The conservative movement has always been about principles, not personalities,” Perry said, before making a not-too-veiled swipe at Donald Trump, the GOP’s current front-runner. “Our nominee should embody those principles. He — or she — must make the case for the cause of conservatism more than the cause of their own celebrity.”

For almost two years, the swaggering Texan had prepared and studied for a second shot at the presidency. But in a 17-candidate field, Perry found himself weakened by fundraisers who ditched him for his rivals and by top surrogates who defected as his campaign crumbled. He raised only about $1 million in the first fundraising quarter, and he never had enough supporters for him to earn a spot in the premier GOP debates. Back in Texas, he remained under indictment on an abuse-of-power charge.

And as it became increasingly clear that the campaign wouldn’t be able to overcome deep financial problems that left him without enough money to win a competitive race, he became the first GOP candidate to leave it.

You can see the rest of the story at cnn.com  By Theodore Schleifer, CNN

Hello world!

Welcome to our virtual office…We are living in troubling times.  Today is 9-11-2015…what does that mean to you?  9-11-2001…what does that day mean to you?  Both dates have and will continue to have many meanings to people all over the globe.  Both dates are days our enemies rejoiced…9-11-2001 was a day that U.S. citizens became Americans, unified in the tragic events, unified in the mission to help and protect our neighbor.  There was no black, white, democrat or republican, WE WERE AMERICANS…

Today 14 years later we have forgot who we are…we are fighting among ourselves, trying to show up the other person.  We have had a vote in congress today just so one side can point the finger at the other.  Not one side did what the PEOPLE of AMERICA put them there to do.   They did what was best for themselvs, so they can stay in and get more power.  Today our country made a deal with DEATH…………………

I pray it is not to late….I pray the AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL RISE UP and take our country back.  “We the people” need to pay attention to what the 2016 candidates are saying and we need to choose very carefully.  I hope to Highlight each candidate and their plans to lead America back to prosperity…I also hope to highlight what is going on that effects our future.  Pay attention and check back often